Wines & Vines Home
   
 
Welcome Guest
LOGIN |  CREATE ACCOUNT
 
 

Editor's Letter

 

Who Owns Your Label?

May 2009
 
by Jim Gordon
 
 
Wines & Vines  reported online in March that dozens if not hundreds of U.S. wineries could lose their ability to market their products in Europe if they continue to use certain common wine terms on their labels. A deadline set by the European Union years ago arrived, and EU officials now consider U.S. imports illegal if their labels carry such good old English terms as "vintage," "tawny," "ruby," and such widely recognized terms of French origin as "chateau," "clos" "sur lie."

Does this raise a long-running trans-Atlantic war of words to an absurd new level? We all know that Europeans have lobbied for decades to get U.S. winemakers to drop "Burgundy," "Port" and "Champagne" from their labels in the U.S., but they haven't had the clout. The Europeans do have the authority in their own countries, and they have successfully banned these misleading geographic terms on imports. They also want to regulate a host of non-geographic terms that they call "traditional expressions."

The EU purpose, however, is not to ban them but to define them, and then enforce their accurate use. That is not absurd, and in fact WineAmerica and Wine Institute have been drafting definitions for the traditional expressions based on how the wines are made and their sensory attributes. WineAmerica passed a resolution including these definitions March 24, and sent it to an EU administrative group for review.

In this resolution, for example, WineAmerica proposes that "tawny," when used on a U.S. fortified wine, is defined as: "...a style of U.S. fortified wine that is aged prior to bottling. At bottling the wine has a red-gold or 'tawny' hue. The wines should reflect the characteristics of careful aging, showing 'developed' rather than fresh fruit characters..." and so on. If the EU accepts these criteria, any wine that fulfills them could be labeled as "tawny." The resolution goes on to define 10 terms in all. We don't love the bureaucracy that will probably calcify around this process, but the idea makes some sense for consumer trust--an extra level of truth in labeling.

The South Africans already have made this leap, and are legally selling "Cape Tawny" fortified wines (with no mention of "Port") in the EU, and Australian fortified wines on sale in the U.S. that are labeled simply as tawny could meet the EU standard, too.

The bigger issue of concern for vintners here is intellectual property. Can the EU claim a host of words as its own intellectual property, despite long-time use and trademark registrations by U.S. vintners? It's one thing if a U.S. fortified wine has to meet an EU definition of "ruby," but it's another if Clos du Val winery in California and Chateau Ste. Michelle in Washington cannot use their familiar brand names at all in the EU.

"The U.S. without a doubt objects to the EU's attempts to make monopolistic properties out of these terms," said Joe Rollo of the Wine Institute. "We don't want to see intellectual property created instantly."

The Europeans consider "chateau" and "clos" as traditional expressions, and they might not allow them in brand names when the wines do not meet their definitions of the terms. "This is something we currently reject," agreed Bill Nelson, president of WineAmerica. "We believe there can be common ground on definitions, but that the brand name cannot be restricted."

WineAmerica proposed this broad definition for "clos/chateau:" "A wine produced by a winery located in an appellation of origin as defined by 27 C.F.R. §4.25. The term may be used in a brand name of the winery." If the EU accepts a definition similar to that, then all may be well. But it's too early to tell.

The war of words has special significance in this time of recession, when shipments overseas are the brightest spot in the wine economy. Anything that dims exports right now is doubly bad.

EU wine labeling regulations should not override existing international trademark law. We urge the EU to recognize that U.S. vintners who chose generic French names for their brands many years ago should not be banned from selling in Europe.
 
SHARE »
Close
 
Currently no comments posted for this article.
 
 
SEE OTHER EDITIONS OF THIS COLUMN ï¿½ CURRENT COLUMN ARTICLES »


 
Wines & Vines Home
 
866.453.9701 | 415.453.9700 | Fax: 415.453.2517
65 Mitchell Blvd., Ste. A San Rafael, CA 94903
info@winesandvines.com
Wine Industry Metrics
 
Off-Premise Sales » Month   12 Months  
September 2014 $575 million
5%
$7,743 million
6%
September 2013 $550 million $7,311 million
     
Direct-to-Consumer Shipments » Month   12 Months  
September 2014 $163 million
16%
$1,708 million
11%
September 2013 $141 million $1,538 million
     
Winery Job Index » Month   12 Months  
September 2014 166
14%
226
18%
September 2013 145 192
     
 
MORE » Released on 10.15.2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Practical Winery & Vineyard Library
 
Search the PWV archive »
 
 

Direct To Consumer
Wine Shipping Report
2014
 
Download full report »
 
 

CALENDAR
  • November 1-2
     
    A Wine & Food Affair
     
  • November 1-2
     
    Temecula Harvest Celebration Barrel Tasting
     
  • November 5
     
    Single Vineyard Night
     
  • November 5-6
     
    Southeastern United Wine & Grape Symposium
     
  • MORE »
 

READER COMMENTS
 
Article: What's Your Winery's IP Worth? »
 
If you would like more information on this seminar please visit The Seminar Group's website....
Reader: Danielle Bingham
 
Article: DtC Is Lifeblood of Wineries, Banker Says »
 
Seems like another locical option would be to have more small niche distrbutors. Consolidation of...
Reader: Guest
 
Article: Tasting Wine From PD-Resistant Grapes »
 
Congratulations Andy! Lots of grapebreeders and southern growers will be looking through the catalogs. i...
Reader: Guest
 
Article: The 'Sideways' Effect »
 
Thank you for this research that confirms what many thought about the pinot noir effect....
Reader: Guest
 
Article: Fine for Volunteer Labor Makes Wineries Wary »
 
This is so incredibly asinine. And my taxes go to help fund these over-reaches? No...
Reader: Philburtonj
 
 


Directory/Buyer's Guide — Your Wine Industry Marketplace
 
 
WINERY SEARCH
 
 
Advanced Search »
SUPPLIER SEARCH
   by Product
 by Company Name or Brand
 
Browse by Category »
2015 Directory/Buyer's Guide
The Wines & Vines Directory and Buyer's Guide
 
 
EXPANDED ONLINE SEARCH INCLUDED WITH PURCHASE
 
ORDER NOW »
 
LEARN MORE »
 
 
Wines & Vines Magazine
 
 
LEARN MORE »
 
SUBSCRIBE »
 
Digital Edition Now Available!
Wines & Vines Digital Edition Now Available
 
LEARN MORE »
 
ORDER NOW »
 
 
The Wines & Vines Online Marketing System
 
The Industry Standard winery marketing application
 
FREE LIVE DEMO »
 
VIEW VIDEO »
 
 
 
 
Latest Job Listings
 Seasonal Customer Happ...
 Napa, CA
General Administration and
 N Ca Brand Manager
 San Francisco, CA
Sales and Marketing
 Special Events Sales M...
 Healdsburg, CA
DTC, Tasting Room and Retai
 Facilities Maintenance...
 Sonoma County, CA
Winemaking and Production
 Asst. Tasting Room Man...
 Glen Ellen, CA
DTC, Tasting Room and Retai
 Addicted To Telesales
 Glen Ellen, CA
DTC, Tasting Room and Retai
 Wine Sales Representat...
 Peninsula/San Francisco, CA
Sales and Marketing
 Receiving And Transpor...
 American Canyon, CA
DTC, Tasting Room and Retai
 Mountain Division Mana...
 Aurora, CO
Sales and Marketing
 Production Assistant
 Sebastopol, CA
Winemaking and Production
 
More Job Listings >>
Follow Us On:
 
 





Home  |  About Us  |  Editors  |  Subscribe  |  Print Edition  |  Digital Edition

Advertise  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
 
 
Copyright © 2001-2014 by Wine Communications Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No material may be reproduced without written permission of the Publisher.
Wines&Vines does not assume any responsibility for any unsolicited manuscripts or materials.