Wines & Vines Home
   
 
Welcome Guest
LOGIN |  CREATE ACCOUNT
 
 

Editor's Letter

 

Who Owns Your Label?

May 2009
 
by Jim Gordon
 
 
Wines & Vines  reported online in March that dozens if not hundreds of U.S. wineries could lose their ability to market their products in Europe if they continue to use certain common wine terms on their labels. A deadline set by the European Union years ago arrived, and EU officials now consider U.S. imports illegal if their labels carry such good old English terms as "vintage," "tawny," "ruby," and such widely recognized terms of French origin as "chateau," "clos" "sur lie."

Does this raise a long-running trans-Atlantic war of words to an absurd new level? We all know that Europeans have lobbied for decades to get U.S. winemakers to drop "Burgundy," "Port" and "Champagne" from their labels in the U.S., but they haven't had the clout. The Europeans do have the authority in their own countries, and they have successfully banned these misleading geographic terms on imports. They also want to regulate a host of non-geographic terms that they call "traditional expressions."

The EU purpose, however, is not to ban them but to define them, and then enforce their accurate use. That is not absurd, and in fact WineAmerica and Wine Institute have been drafting definitions for the traditional expressions based on how the wines are made and their sensory attributes. WineAmerica passed a resolution including these definitions March 24, and sent it to an EU administrative group for review.

In this resolution, for example, WineAmerica proposes that "tawny," when used on a U.S. fortified wine, is defined as: "...a style of U.S. fortified wine that is aged prior to bottling. At bottling the wine has a red-gold or 'tawny' hue. The wines should reflect the characteristics of careful aging, showing 'developed' rather than fresh fruit characters..." and so on. If the EU accepts these criteria, any wine that fulfills them could be labeled as "tawny." The resolution goes on to define 10 terms in all. We don't love the bureaucracy that will probably calcify around this process, but the idea makes some sense for consumer trust--an extra level of truth in labeling.

The South Africans already have made this leap, and are legally selling "Cape Tawny" fortified wines (with no mention of "Port") in the EU, and Australian fortified wines on sale in the U.S. that are labeled simply as tawny could meet the EU standard, too.

The bigger issue of concern for vintners here is intellectual property. Can the EU claim a host of words as its own intellectual property, despite long-time use and trademark registrations by U.S. vintners? It's one thing if a U.S. fortified wine has to meet an EU definition of "ruby," but it's another if Clos du Val winery in California and Chateau Ste. Michelle in Washington cannot use their familiar brand names at all in the EU.

"The U.S. without a doubt objects to the EU's attempts to make monopolistic properties out of these terms," said Joe Rollo of the Wine Institute. "We don't want to see intellectual property created instantly."

The Europeans consider "chateau" and "clos" as traditional expressions, and they might not allow them in brand names when the wines do not meet their definitions of the terms. "This is something we currently reject," agreed Bill Nelson, president of WineAmerica. "We believe there can be common ground on definitions, but that the brand name cannot be restricted."

WineAmerica proposed this broad definition for "clos/chateau:" "A wine produced by a winery located in an appellation of origin as defined by 27 C.F.R. §4.25. The term may be used in a brand name of the winery." If the EU accepts a definition similar to that, then all may be well. But it's too early to tell.

The war of words has special significance in this time of recession, when shipments overseas are the brightest spot in the wine economy. Anything that dims exports right now is doubly bad.

EU wine labeling regulations should not override existing international trademark law. We urge the EU to recognize that U.S. vintners who chose generic French names for their brands many years ago should not be banned from selling in Europe.
 
SHARE »
Close
 
Currently no comments posted for this article.
 
 
SEE OTHER EDITIONS OF THIS COLUMN ï¿½ CURRENT COLUMN ARTICLES »


 
Wines & Vines Home
 
866.453.9701 | 415.453.9700 | Fax: 415.453.2517
65 Mitchell Blvd., Ste. A San Rafael, CA 94903
info@winesandvines.com
Wine Industry Metrics
 
Off-Premise Sales » Month   12 Months  
January 2015 $623 million
7%
$7,912 million
5%
January 2014 $583 million $7,514 million
     
Direct-to-Consumer Shipments » Month   12 Months  
January 2015 $75 million
-3%
$1,818 million
15%
January 2014 $77 million $1,584 million
     
Winery Job Index » Month   12 Months  
January 2015 259
26%
233
15%
January 2014 205 203
     
 
MORE » Released on 02.13.2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Direct To Consumer
Wine Shipping Report
2015
 
Download full report »
 
 

Practical Winery & Vineyard Library
 
Search the PWV archive »
 
 

CALENDAR
  • March 2-5
     
    Decouvertes en Vallee du Rhone
     
  • March 4-6
     
    Michigan Wine & Grape Conference
     
  • March 12
     
    Central Coast Insights
     
  • March 13-15
     
    Women of the Vine
     
  • MORE »
 

READER COMMENTS
 
Article: Scurlock joins wine hall of fame »
 
Congratulations David!
Reader: Guest
 
Article: Wineries Cautioned About Internet 'Ads' »
 
I guess my first question would be why is there a three tier system to...
Reader: Guest
 
Article: Wine on the Rocks »
 
Great potential! Mineralities are sought after and can be found in these rock formations with...
Reader: Bruce Coulthard
 
Article: 90% of U.S. Consumers Can Buy Wine Direct »
 
You say that 90% of the consumers can buy wine direct. Really? In most cases...
Reader: Guest
 
Article: Wineries Cautioned About Internet 'Ads' »
 
It is an unfortunate fact that the regulations have no understanding of modern technology and...
Reader: Paul Mabray
 
 


Directory/Buyer's Guide — Your Wine Industry Marketplace
 
 
WINERY SEARCH
 
 
Advanced Search »
SUPPLIER SEARCH
   by Product
 by Company Name or Brand
 
Browse by Category »
2015 Directory/Buyer's Guide
The Wines & Vines Directory and Buyer's Guide
 
 
EXPANDED ONLINE SEARCH INCLUDED WITH PURCHASE
 
ORDER NOW »
 
LEARN MORE »
 
 
Wines & Vines Magazine
 
 
LEARN MORE »
 
SUBSCRIBE »
 
Digital Edition Now Available!
Wines & Vines Digital Edition Now Available
 
LEARN MORE »
 
ORDER NOW »
 
 
The Wines & Vines Online Marketing System
 
The Industry Standard winery marketing application
 
FREE LIVE DEMO »
 
VIEW VIDEO »
 
 
 
 
Latest Job Listings
 Sales Representative
 N. Dallas Area, College Station, TX
Sales and Marketing
 Fine Wine Sales Repres...
 Sf Bay Area,, CA
Sales and Marketing
 Corporate Counsel
 Santa Rosa, CA
General Administration and
 Skilled Cellar Worker
 Santa Rosa, CA
Winemaking and Production
 Tasting Room Assistant
 Napa, CA
DTC, Tasting Room and Retai
 Tasting Room Lead
 Sonoma, CA
DTC, Tasting Room and Retai
 Inventory Manager
 Sonoma, CA
Winemaking and Production
 Event And Marketing Co...
 Kasota, MN
Sales and Marketing
 Dtc Estate Representat...
 Angwin, CA
Sales and Marketing
 Full-Time Lecturer/Pil...
 San Luis Obispo, CA
Winemaking and Production
 
More Job Listings >>
Follow Us On:
 
 





Home  |  About Us  |  Editors  |  Subscribe  |  Print Edition  |  Digital Edition

Advertise  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
 
 
Copyright © 2001-2015 by Wine Communications Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No material may be reproduced without written permission of the Publisher.
Wines&Vines does not assume any responsibility for any unsolicited manuscripts or materials.