Wines & Vines Home
   
 
Welcome Guest
LOGIN |  CREATE ACCOUNT
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
 
 
07.11.2013  
 

Privatization Is Political Victim in Pennsylvania

Supporters of dismantling state liquor monopoly expect bid to see more success in the fall, when legislature reconvenes

 
by Andrew Adams
 
 
pennsylvania
 
The Pennsylvania State Capitol became the site of political wrangling during the most recent legislative session when, in spite of pleas from Gov. Tom Corbett, the state Senate failed to pass legislation related to the state liquor monopoly.
Harrisburg, Pa.—The drive to privatize liquor and wine in Pennsylvania made it all the way to the goal line but ultimately faltered and failed amid political wrangling.

This March, Pennsylvania’s House of Representatives made history by passing a bill that would dismantle the state monopoly on wine and liquor sales as well as loosen beer distribution and sales. An amended version of the bill had passed committee in the state Senate, where it appeared to have support from enough lawmakers for approval.

On June 30, Gov. Tom Corbett released a statement urging senators to pass the bill and send it back to the House for concurrence so he could sign it into law. “This bill as amended is a historic step, and we must not lose this opportunity to deliver a reform the people of Pennsylvania want and deserve.”

State senators, however, failed to pass it. They reportedly balked at the bill because they couldn’t be assured lawmakers in the House would pass legislation for increased spending on transportation infrastructure, another of Corbett’s top priorities.

With a state budget approved by the July 1 deadline, lawmakers adjourned for their summer break leaving privatization in limbo and Gov. Corbett’s agenda in doubt.

Support remains
“We don’t think it’s dead by any means,” said Katrina Anderson, a senior policy analyst and director of government affairs for the free market advocacy group Commonwealth Foundation in Harrisburg. “We’re confident they’re still hearing from constituents when they return home this summer.”

Anderson said privatization is supported by a majority of voters in the state and the legislature’s inability to pass some type of reform was decried as a failure in several newspaper editorials.

She said after the historic vote on privatization by the House, the Senate was unprepared to move forward on the issue. State representatives had passed a privatization bill that would have dismantled the state-run liquor business. The Senate, however, has favored a milder “modernization” approach that would phase out the state’s role in wine and liquor sales.

The fact that senators were able to advance an amended version of the House bill shows they are more open to a direct privatization approach. When the legislature reconvenes in the fall, Anderson said she expects the debate to start from there.

Republican Sen. Chuck McIlhinney, chair of the law and justice committee, helped draft the Senate legislation. In a statement released July 3, McIlhinney defended the bill as a commonsense approach to privatize the state system and “rejected the special interests who play political game and aren’t accountable to taxpayers or voters.”

He said the bill would allow beer, wine and specialty liquor sales at grocery stores and wouldn’t require consumers to purchase food and alcohol from two separate checkout areas. “My legislation also makes it legal for direct wine shipments from wine producers to our homes—something consumers have been demanding for decades.”

The bill offers “clear direction” on closing state liquor stores and also requires two years of monitoring to ensure privatization doesn’t trigger any negative effects on the state economy.

Opposition from union, beer distributors
Anderson said privatization faced strong opposition from the influential Malt Beverage Distributors Association of Pennsylvania. The group argued that the privatization proposal would spell economic doom for its members as well as flood the state with outlets selling alcoholic beverages. The union of liquor store employees also vigorously campaigned against the measure.

In an op-ed piece published July 7, Wendell W. Young IV, the chairman of Local 1776 of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union, argued privatization did not pass because the House and Senate were working on “radically” different pieces of legislation and many lawmakers didn’t want to approve anything that would put independently owned beer distributors out of business.

He argued most state residents favor modernizing the existing system because it’s the best way to give consumers what they want while not putting state or private employees out of work. “Modernization is not complicated—and it’s not ideological,” Young wrote.

According to the state’s online lobbying database, $957,493 has been spent on alcoholic beverage lobbying in 2013. The database only had what was spent in the first three months of the year, but top spenders included the United Food and Commercial Workers, which spent $54,038 to lobby against the effort and three retailers, Wegman’s Food Markets, Sheetz Inc. and Giant Eagle, which spent a combined total of $175,439 for privatization. MillerCoors spent $21,961 and Anheuser-Busch spent $37,008 lobbying against privatization.

SHARE »
Close
 
Currently no comments posted for this article.
 
CURRENT NEWS INDEX »


 
Wines & Vines Home
 
866.453.9701 | 415.453.9700 | Fax: 415.453.2517
65 Mitchell Blvd., Ste. A San Rafael, CA 94903
info@winesandvines.com
Wine Industry Metrics
 
Off-Premise Sales » Month   12 Months  
June 2014 $562 million
5%
$7,549 million
6%
June 2013 $535 million $7,094 million
     
Direct-to-Consumer Shipments » Month   12 Months  
June 2014 $87 million
17%
$1,669 million
11%
June 2013 $74 million $1,510 million
     
Winery Job Index » Month   12 Months  
June 2014 300
34%
220
21%
June 2013 224 182
     
 
MORE » Released on 07.15.2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Wines & Vines
Packaging Conference
 
Learn More »
 
 

Practical Winery & Vineyard Library
 
Search the PWV archive »
 
 

Direct To Consumer
Wine Shipping Report
2014
 
Download full report »
 
 

CALENDAR
  • July 29
     
    Organic Winegrowing Conference
     
  • July 30
     
    Sweet and Fortified Wine Association Meeting
     
  • July 30 - August 1
     
    Indy International Wine Competition
     
  • August 1-3
     
    West of West Festival
     
  • MORE »
 

READER COMMENTS
 
Article: Wineries May Lose Internet Domain Dispute »
 
All these arguments could be levied by any industry associated with any gTLD, new or...
Reader: Doug Barnett
 
Article: Wineries May Lose Internet Domain Dispute »
 
Do brands get hijacked now? Even though .wine does not yet exist, are there false...
Reader: Larry Chandler
 
Article: Resistant Weeds Threaten Vineyards »
 
Roundup is not benign. It does not always break down in a day or two...
Reader: Robert Rex
 
Article: Resistant Weeds Threaten Vineyards »
 
Mitigating water use in the vineyard in the first place is also an applicable tactic....
Reader: Guest
 
Article: Resistant Weeds Threaten Vineyards »
 
Having managed vineyards that have used both approaches, I would say that a diverse approach...
Reader: Guest
 
 


Directory/Buyer's Guide — Your Wine Industry Marketplace
 
 
WINERY SEARCH
 
 
Advanced Search »
SUPPLIER SEARCH
   by Product
 by Company Name or Brand
 
Browse by Category »
2014 Directory/Buyer's Guide
The Wines & Vines Directory and Buyer's Guide
 
 
EXPANDED ONLINE SEARCH INCLUDED WITH PURCHASE
 
ORDER NOW »
 
LEARN MORE »
 
 
Wines & Vines Magazine
 
 
LEARN MORE »
 
SUBSCRIBE »
 
Digital Edition Now Available!
Wines & Vines Digital Edition Now Available
 
LEARN MORE »
 
ORDER NOW »
 
 
The Wines & Vines Online Marketing System
 
The Industry Standard winery marketing application
 
FREE LIVE DEMO »
 
VIEW VIDEO »
 
 
 
 
Latest Job Listings
 Harvest Cellar Staff 2...
 Santa Rosa, CA
Winemaking and Production
 Server
 Healdsburg, CA
General Administration and
 Tasting Room/Guest Rel...
 Sonoma, CA
DTC, Tasting Room and Retai
 Harvest Intern
 Napa, CA
Winemaking and Production
 Sales Position-Metro B...
 Boston, MA
Sales and Marketing
 Viticulture Harvest In...
 Napa And Sonoma Counties, CA
Vineyards
 District Manager - Met...
 New York, NY
Sales and Marketing
 Director Of Spirits
 Tampa, FL
Sales and Marketing
 Vip Hospitality Concie...
 Napa, CA
Sales and Marketing
 Director Of Winery Rel...
 St. Helena, CA
Sales and Marketing
 
More Job Listings >>
Follow Us On:
 
 





Home  |  About Us  |  Editors  |  Subscribe  |  Print Edition  |  Digital Edition

Advertise  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
 
 
Copyright © 2001-2014 by Wine Communications Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No material may be reproduced without written permission of the Publisher.
Wines&Vines does not assume any responsibility for any unsolicited manuscripts or materials.