Wines & Vines Home
   
 
Welcome Guest
LOGIN |  CREATE ACCOUNT
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
 
 
10.01.2013  
 

Paso Winegrowers Back on TTB Track

After seven years, 11 districts await final approval

 
by Jane Firstenfeld
 
 
paso robles sub appellations
 
TTB is accepting comments regarding 11 proposed subappellations within the Paso Robles AVA. Image source: Tablas Creek Winery
Paso Robles, Calif.—It may be a record: In 2007, 59 winery owners and grapegrowers from Paso Robles asked the TTB to establish 11 subappellations within the 612,000-acre Paso Robles American Viticultural Area. The petitions, which occupy more than 30 pages of small type on the TTB website, remained in limbo for almost seven years, stalled while the TTB revisited its internal procedures and halted approvals for subappellations.

Wines & Vines and other industry media published extensive reports about the petition at the time, so there was a certain sense of “déjà vu all over again” when TTB posted Notice 140 on its website last week. Was this the same petition? The same petitioners?
    Four other AVAs approved
     

     
    Hours before the government shutdown, TTB issued a press release announcing final approval of four new California AVAs: Ballard Canyon, 7,800 acres in Santa Barbara County; 17,633-acre Moon Mountain District in Sonoma County; 11,000-acre Big Valley-Lake County and 9,100-acre Kelsey Bench-Lake County.

In its announcement, the bureau explained its policies and rationale: “TTB is issuing this proposal in response to 11 petitions submitted simultaneously by the Paso Robles American Viticultural Area Committee, a local wine industry group whose 59 members cumulatively own or manage over 10,000 acres of vineyards within the proposed viticultural areas. TTB designates viticultural areas to allow vintners to better describe the origin of their wines and to allow consumers to better identify wines they may purchase.”

The original 2007 petition from the ad hoc Paso Robles AVA Committee headed by Jerry Lohr, remains intact in virtually all details. Christopher Taranto, spokesman for the Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance, confirmed that although the TTB took its time to question certain issues, the committee’s initial investment in money and time eventually paid off, and no additional research was required.

When the petitions were first submitted in 2007, he recalled, the TTB was somewhat overwhelmed. “There were so many at the time,” he said. “This was also the most complex and thought-out application they’d had,” requesting an 11-part subdivision of an established AVA at one time.

“It was genuinely the largest single request,” Taranto said. “That alone had them needing to spend a lot of time on it. The TTB put in a moratorium while they rethought their petition/review process.” During that period and the simultaneous recession, the TTB trimmed its staff while attempting to streamline and speed up its services to the public.

Over time the bureau came back to the committee to clarify various questions. Interestingly, one gray area was in the furthest northwest quadrant of the Paso Robles AVA. The TTB wanted to know why was it not included in any of the new proposals? “It’s government property,” Taranto said. “It’s part of a military base.” Other gray areas appeared in municipal zones inappropriate or unavailable for grapegrowing.

The proposed districts are: Adelaida, Creston District, El Pomar District, Paso Robles Estrella, Paso Robles Geneseo, Paso Robles Highlands, Paso Robles Willow Creek, San Juan Creek, San Miguel, Santa Margarita Ranch and Templeton Gap.

Bases well covered
Composed of well-established wine and grape businesses, the AVA committee addressed the most potentially divisive issue in advance. Conjunctive labeling requires that wines from the subappellations continue to include the Paso Robles brand on their labels.

“We passed conjunctive labeling in 2007,” Tarranto confirmed. “Our labels will always say ‘Paso.’” This not only allows the Paso Robles AVA to avoid future problems but also to side-step the litigious trademark issues that initially put the TTB on pause while dealing with furious trade-name issues related to Napa’s Calistoga district, which was eventually approved in 2009.

Not a sure thing
Public comments on the TTB site confirm that this is not yet a done deal, and not everyone buys into the logic of 11 subappellations for Paso.

Stakeholder Steve Felten, owner/winemaker at 1,000-case Felten Cellars in Paso Robles, submitted this comment: “As a professional winemaker and consultant in Paso Robles for 18 years, and having managed or contracted with vineyards in all of the proposed AVAs, I am vehemently opposed to establishing any new viticultural areas in Paso Robles.

“There are enough microclimates and varying soil profiles within each area to make these designations meaningless and arbitrary. These requests were based on politics and bullying by a few large interests that have undue influence on local organizations. Wine producers in Paso Robles, as a group, would be better served to promote the region as a whole. We have bigger issues to address such as the water table, and the divisiveness that these AVAs will generate is coun terproductive to our mutual success.”

A second negative comment came from Derek Engles, sommelier and wine buyer for a major Las Vegas concern (he asked that the name not be published). He called the proposal “A truly bad idea.”

Engles explained: “If a producer has that much of a drastically superior vineyard, then he or she should be focused on the promotion of that particular site. This proposal sounds great for those in Paso thinking that their subappellaiton will be the next big thing, but at the consumer level, it seeks to confuse and nothing more.”

Citing Oregon’s Willamette Valley, he questioned: “How much time, energy and treasure have they spent mapping out the intricacies of each sub-AVA,” only to have consumers continue to ask sommeliers if Yamhill-Carlton Pinot is as good as Willamette Valley?

“If Paso Robles spent a little more time getting the word out, and a little less time trying to be the next Napa, the long-term would be more promising for sure.”

Engles confirmed to Wines & Vines his belief that establishing the 11 new subappellations would create more confusion among consumers in the retail arena. “I still am dealing with guests about what Rutherford means to Napa.” Most consumers, he said, “just want to drink a good glass of wine. It took Burgundy 1,000 years to get their ideologies down.”

In a wine world where some drinkers are still not quite certain that Sonoma wines don’t come from Napa Valley, his point is well taken.

Taranto responded to this valid concern: “I get that people outside the region will say we are not well known enough (as a region). But we want to be prepared for the future. The areas are distinct.

“The big thing locally, for the most part, is that everybody here is still all about the Paso brand first. The 59 proprietors (on the petition) are still thinking that a rising tide floats all boats.”

As recognition and the Paso Robles wine industry grow, he commented, the region will not have to rush into anything or force an issues.

Too soon to celebrate?
Given the TTB’s long and careful examination of the petition, and barring any unforeseen trademark disputes, it’s widely assumed that the government will approve the petition in short order. Tablas Creek Winery published a celebratory edition of its blog to mark the occasion. 

But, with the onset this morning of the federal government shutdown, the TTB’s website welcomes readers with an ominous announcement: “Due to the government shutdown, information on this website is available, but may not be up to date.”

In Notice No. 140, TTB requested public comments on the petition to be submitted before Jan. 21, 2014. Whether these will be received, evaluated or posted in a timely manner remains in question. 

SHARE »
Close
LATEST READER COMMENTS
 
 
Posted on 10.08.2014 - 10:36:22 PST
 
Unfortunately, they will be named Drought sinkhole #1, #2, #3, etc.

Really, 11 different flavor profiles of Zin or Pets? Most consumers still don't know more than 2 in Napa, and 2 in Sonoma. Paso is a good place but does not command $50 plus on a routine basis. Who are they talking to with eleven more meaningless pieces of info to sift thru? How bout just a little bit of readable, factual info on your back labels and nevermind 11 places that THE CONSUMER doesn't need to know.
 
Donn Rutkoff
 
 
 
CURRENT NEWS INDEX »


 
Wines & Vines Home
 
866.453.9701 | 415.453.9700 | Fax: 415.453.2517
65 Mitchell Blvd., Ste. A San Rafael, CA 94903
info@winesandvines.com
Wine Industry Metrics
 
Off-Premise Sales » Month   12 Months  
November 2014 $708 million
5%
$7,844 million
6%
November 2013 $673 million $7,428 million
     
Direct-to-Consumer Shipments » Month   12 Months  
November 2014 $274 million
21%
$1,799 million
16%
November 2013 $225 million $1,558 million
     
Winery Job Index » Month   12 Months  
November 2014 127
-5%
226
15%
November 2013 134 196
     
 
MORE » Released on 12.15.2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

FEATURES
 

Practical Winery & Vineyard Library
 
Search the PWV archive »
 
 

Direct To Consumer
Wine Shipping Report
2014
 
Download full report »
 
 

CALENDAR
  • January 7
     
    Putting Your Brand to Work
     
  • January 9-18
     
    Icewine Festival
     
  • January 13-16
     
    VinCO
     
  • January 15
     
    WineFlavor 101B
     
  • MORE »
 

READER COMMENTS
 
Article: Grape Industry Lukewarm on Immigration Act »
 
A band-aid it may be but instead of the negative tone of this article which...
Reader: Guest
 
Article: Oregon Wine Institute Plans for the Future »
 
When Mark is involved, things are going to work out just great! We miss the...
Reader: Peter Bell
 
Article: Spanish Cooper Sells Chinese Oak »
 
I would love to find Us wineries using the Chinese oak barrels. Do you know...
Reader: Guest
 
Article: Prohibition Laws Linger 81 Years Later »
 
Trader Joe's (Union Square) and Whole Foods (Upper West Side) both have wine shops attached...
Reader: Guest
 
Article: Prohibition Laws Linger 81 Years Later »
 
Maybe the economy could use another boost by repealing the post-prohibitionary laws too. Make it...
Reader: csm noble
 
 


Directory/Buyer's Guide — Your Wine Industry Marketplace
 
 
WINERY SEARCH
 
 
Advanced Search »
SUPPLIER SEARCH
   by Product
 by Company Name or Brand
 
Browse by Category »
2015 Directory/Buyer's Guide
The Wines & Vines Directory and Buyer's Guide
 
 
EXPANDED ONLINE SEARCH INCLUDED WITH PURCHASE
 
ORDER NOW »
 
LEARN MORE »
 
 
Wines & Vines Magazine
 
 
LEARN MORE »
 
SUBSCRIBE »
 
Digital Edition Now Available!
Wines & Vines Digital Edition Now Available
 
LEARN MORE »
 
ORDER NOW »
 
 
The Wines & Vines Online Marketing System
 
The Industry Standard winery marketing application
 
FREE LIVE DEMO »
 
VIEW VIDEO »
 
 
 
 
Latest Job Listings
 Sales Rep - Kansas Cit...
 Kansas City, MO
Sales and Marketing
 Director Of Hospitalit...
 Napa, CA
DTC, Tasting Room and Retai
 Skilled Cellar Worker ...
 Santa Rosa, CA
Winemaking and Production
 Public Relations Accou...
 San Francisco, CA
Sales and Marketing
 Portfolio Marketing Ma...
 White Plains, NY
Sales and Marketing
 Midwest Regional Sales...
 Midwest Usa, IL
Sales and Marketing
 Vineyard Manager
 St. Helena, CA
Vineyards
 International Marketin...
 St. Helena, CA
Sales and Marketing
 Sales Representatives
 North And South, CA
Sales and Marketing
 On-Call Chef
 Rutherford, CA
General Administration and
 
More Job Listings >>
Follow Us On:
 
 





Home  |  About Us  |  Editors  |  Subscribe  |  Print Edition  |  Digital Edition

Advertise  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
 
 
Copyright © 2001-2014 by Wine Communications Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No material may be reproduced without written permission of the Publisher.
Wines&Vines does not assume any responsibility for any unsolicited manuscripts or materials.